Kempenaers, B.; Verheyen, G. R.; Dhondt, A. A.: Mate guarding and copulation behaviour in monogamous and polygynous blue tits: Do males follow a best-of-a-bad-job strategy? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 36 (1), pp. 33 - 42 (1995)
Verheyen, G. R.; Kempenaers, B.; Adriaensen, F.; van den Broeck, M.; Matthysen, E.; van Broeckhoven, C.; Dhondt, A. A.: The genetic structure of Parus caeruleus (blue tit) populations as revealed by minisatellite single locus probes. Heredity 75 (6), pp. 571 - 577 (1995)
Kempenaers, B.: Polygyny in the blue tit: Unbalanced sex ratio and female aggression restrict mate choice. Animal Behaviour 47 (4), pp. 943 - 957 (1994)
Verheyen, G. R.; Kempenaers, B.; Burke, T.; van den Broeck, M.; van Broeckhoven, C.; Dhondt, A. A.: Identification of hypervariable single locus minisatellite DNA probes in the blue tit Parus caeruleus. Molecular Ecology 3 (2), pp. 137 - 143 (1994)
Kempenaers, B.; Dhondt, A. A.: Why do females engage in extra-pair copulations? A review of hypotheses and predictions. Belgian Journal of Zoology 123, pp. 93 - 103 (1993)
Kempenaers, B.; Dhondt, A. A.: Experimental test of an hypothesis explaining density dependent clutch-size in tits Parus spp. Ibis 134 (2), pp. 192 - 194 (1992)
Kempenaers, B.; Verheyen, G. R.; van den Broeck, M.; Burke, T.; van Broeckhoven, C.; Dhondt, A. A.: Extra-pair paternity results from female preference for high-quality males in the blue tit. Nature 357 (6378), pp. 494 - 496 (1992)
Kempenaers, B.; Dhondt, A. A.: Competition between blue and great tit for roosting sites in winter: An aviary experiment. Ornis Scandinavica 22, pp. 73 - 75 (1991)
Schlicht, E.; Kempenaers, B.: Extra-pair paternity and sexual selection. In: From genes to animal behavior: Social structures, personalities, comminication by color, pp. 35 - 65 (Eds. Inoue-Murayama, M.; Kawamura, S.; Weiss, A.). Springer, Tokyo, Heidelberg (2011)
Commentary on: Vojtěch Kubelka, Miroslav Šálek, Pavel Tomkovich, Zsolt Végvári, Robert P. Freckleton, Tamás Székely, Global pattern of nest predation is disrupted by climate change in shorebirds, Science 362 (6415), pp. 680-683. (2021)
Have you ever wondered how animals communicate with one another? Or perhaps, how decisions, such as where to eat, are made in species which live in groups? These questions have puzzled many biologists, but with recent developments in animal tracking technology, answers to these questions can finally be addressed. In my research, I am investigating…
To stay together, group-living animals must reach consensus about where to go and what to do. Because individuals differ in their needs and capabilities, group members’ preferences will not always align. Resolving such conflicts of interest is a key challenge to living in stable, socially complex societies. How is influence exerted? How is…
Sleep is an inherently risky behavioral state, defined by decreased sensitivity to environmental stimuli. Sleeping together with other individuals offers a variety of advantages, including protection from predators and buffering against cold nighttime temperatures. However, group members also compete with each other over access to the safest…
How does life in the canopy shape the evolution of the mind? The foraging decisions of kinkajous - an elusive species that forages in neo-tropical forest canopies at night - may offer some clues. The central aim of this project is to identify the processes of learning and memory that allow kinkajous to keep track of when and where to find their…